Legal Opinion

Sciaba Construction Corp. v. Frank Bean, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 30, 1997No. 95-P-1400PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On its face, the language contained in subcontracts entered into by Sciaba Construction Corp. (Sciaba), a general contractor, and Frank Bean, Inc. (Bean), and Thermal Insulation Corp. (Thermal), subcontractors, egregiously violates *67G. L. c. 149, § 29C. That statute declared void a provision in a subcontract that requires the subcontractor to indemnify the general contractor for damages that the subcontractor did not cause. Section 29C has been the subject of much discussion of late in our cases. See Jones v. Vappi & Co., 28 Mass. App. Ct. 77, 81-82 (1989); Harnois v. Quannapowitt Dev., Inc.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herson v. New Boston Garden Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Kelly v. DIMEO, INC. WATERPROOFING CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Harnois v. QUANNAPOWITT DEVELOPMENT, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. Callahan v. A. J. Welch Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robbins v. KrockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  2. North American Site Developers, Inc. v. MRP Site Development, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. American Insurance Co. v. Siena Construction Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  4. Eastman v. YutzyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  5. Larrabee v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API