Legal Opinion

Gafney v. Wilson County Hospital

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs have invoked our original jurisdiction in mandamus to compel defendants to extend to plaintiffs as duly licensed osteopathic physicians the right to use the county hospital for the purpose of treating their patients.

To the alternative writ allowed, defendants have filed a motion to quash, on 'various grounds, the first of which is that plaintiffs have no legal capacity to maintain the action. So far as concerns the plaintiff Gaffney, the motion is not good, under many of our precedents. (Kittredge v. Boyd, 136 Kan. 691, 18 P. 2d 536; Kern v. Newton City Commissioners, 147 Kan. 471…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Kern v. City Commissioners of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Wentworth v. Russell State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API