Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Pullam

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Civil Action to Recover Land.

1Opinion of the CourtDick, J.

This case is submitted for determination upon briefs and a statement of facts agreed upon by the counsel of the parties. Both parties claim the land in controversy from the state under grants which are conceded to be regular in form. The grant of the plaintiff was issued July 13, 1846, and he has never had actual possession of any part of the lands included in the grant of defendant. The grant of defendant is dated twenty-first of December, 1847, and he has had continuous possession of that part of the land included in both grants, and has cultivated, and exercised other acts of ownership…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Spencer v. LapsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Doe on Dem of McConnell v. McConnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  4. Cowles v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Payne Butler v. Providence Gas CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  4. Peters v. KellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API