Legal Opinion

Tarson v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*866Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Jim Stagnitta Electric (defendant) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Anthony C. Tarson (plaintiff) from an electric shock when he touched a current transformer box that had been installed the day before, outside a restaurant. The box was installed by James Stagnitta, the owner of defendant, under the supervision of defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Vaynberg v. Provident Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Miccio v. Wade Lupe Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Trapani v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martinez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Silverman v. SciartelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API