Legal Opinion

State v. Hackfath

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Gf-reene County Circuit Court, W. F. GI-eiger, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

The defendant was indicted, arraigned, tried, and found guilty of the mistreatment of a domestic animal, under the provisions of section 1609, Revised Statutes, and sentenced to pay a fine of five dollars.

The law provides that, “if any person shall * * * cruelly beat, mutilate, cruelly kill, or overdrive, any domestic animal * * * he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.”

The indictment charged that the defendant “unlawfully, with a club, four feet in length and two inches-thick, maliciously and cruelly beat a certain horse, the property of him, the said William Hackfath, from the-effects…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. State v. HaneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. State v. RocheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API