T & W DEVELOPERS, INC. v. Salmonsen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
We review the trial court’s order granting prevailing party attorney’s fees pursuant to section 723.068, Florida Statutes (2005), in favor of Appellees, .the Homeowners’ Association of Hollywood Estates and certain residents as class action plaintiffs. Although Appellant, T & W Developers, Inc. (“T & W”), challenges both entitlement to, and the amount of, attorney’s fees and costs awarded, we only address the issue of entitlement because we conclude that neither party was entitled to attorney’s fees. Accordingly, we reverse.
Hollywood Estates is an age-restricted mobile home subdivision…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Hinkley v. GOULD, COOKSEY, FENNELLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Colonel v. MeyersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by16 opinions
- Valcarcel v. CHASE BANK USA NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Tubbs v. Mechanik Nuccio Hearne & Wester, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Raza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. EhrlichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Royal Palm Village Residents, Inc. v. Monica SliderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.