Legal Opinion
Dvorak v. City of Bloomington
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 2003No. 53S01-0209-CV-472PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
This appeal challenges the trial court's determination that a local zoning ordinance restricting the number of unrelated adult persons per dwelling in a single-family residential zone does not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Indiana Constitution and was not an ultra vires act. We affirm.
Peter Dvorak is the owner of a residential property located at 107 S. Bryan Avenue in Bloomington. On April 28, 1996, the City filed a complaint against Dvorak and the other defendants-appellants, tenants of Dvorak (hereinafter collectively "Dvorak"), claiming that they…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Boehm v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wanda Goodpaster v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Paul Stieler Enterprises, Inc. v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- League of Women Voters of Indiana, Inc. v. RokitaIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General and Rick J. Ruble, Commissioner of the In. Dept. of Labor v. James M. Sweeney, David A. Fagan, Charles SeversIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.