Legal Opinion

Roman Torino v. Texaco, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 16, 1967No. 16244_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT STALEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a dismissal for want of prosecution of a seaman’s civil action. The dismissal was prompted by the failure of the plaintiff-appellant, Roman Torino, to appear at his trial. Despite the fact that Torino’s counsel was prepared to try the case, the district court on its own motion dismissed the case. The precise question before us is whether an action may be dismissed for want of prosecution where counsel is ready to proceed in the absence of his client. We hold that, under the particular circumstances present here, a dismissal was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dinsel v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Joseph Lynn v. American Barge Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Juan Corchado v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. William P. Kenney v. California Tanker Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. J. F. Edwards Construction Co. v. Anderson Safeway Guard Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. TITUS, Thomas E., Appellant, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF NORTH AMERICACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Pack v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API