Legal Opinion

State v. Suarez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 12, 2002No. 3D01-1920Published

1Per curiam

After it properly denied Defendant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, the trial court erroneously decided to treat Defendant’s Motion as a timely Rule 3.850 Motion pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), and found that a prima facie case was made that required an evidentiary hearing on the Defendant’s allegations. The Defendant correctly concedes that the trial court erred in ruling that Wood applied to him. See Walker v. State, 799 So.2d 275, 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we reverse the Order under review and remand with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API