Legal Opinion

Erie Railroad v. Duplak

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 1932No. 608PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Michael Duplak, a boy five years of age, sustained personal injuries, resulting in the loss of a leg, while playing upon a railroad bridge built by petitioner over a canal in Passaic, New Jersey. The track crossing the bridge was used only for drilling freight cars — that is, for pulling them into and out from sidings. At the time of the accident the boy was resting on his right knee, looking down into the water of the canal, with his left leg extended over the rail and under one of a string of cars standing on the bridge. While he was in that position, other cars were backed against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. HiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Turess v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Barcolini v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Kaproli v. Central R.R. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  5. Erie R. v. HiltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Egan v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Petition of Red Star Barge LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API