Legal Opinion
Foreman v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1997No. 96-60510Published
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION
Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:
The opinion issued in this ease under date of May 22, 1997 is withdrawn and the following is issued in place thereof.
In this case under the Americans with Disabilities Act,'42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Earl Foreman alleged at trial that his employer failed to reasonably accommodate Foreman’s limitations arising from his heart condition. At the close of all evidence, the district court entered judgment as a matter of law in favor of the employer, holding that the evidence could not support a jury finding…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Robert D. Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Karen Pierce Harvey ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.