Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hornsby v. Slade

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 2003No. 2002 CA 2138Published

1DissentLMcCLENDON, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

Admittedly, if not for the Mineral Code the sale of the property in this matter would be subject to rescission for lesion beyond moiety. Further, land with mineral deposits is clearly more valuable than similar land without mineral deposits. However, that is not the issue before this court. The only issue is whether the Mineral Code is or is not applicable to this sale of property. It is my opinion that the provisions of the Mineral Code do apply and that the sale in question was not le-sionary, in accordance with LSA-R.S. 31:17.

*447The majority of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. United States v. 43.42 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API