Legal Opinion
Golden v. Baghdoian
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1997No. Docket No. 193775PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendants seek leave to appeal a pretrial ruling of the Wayne Circuit Court, declaring § 2169(1)(a) of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.2169(1)(a); MSA 27A.2169(1)(a), as amended in 19931 to be in conflict with MRE 702 and therefore violative of the Michigan Supreme Court’s exclusive rule-making power under Const 1963, art 6, § 5. In light of the importance of this issue, both to our jurisprudence and to our constitutional scheme of state government, Const 1963, art 3, § 2, in lieu of granting or denying leave we have opted to issue this peremptory opinion. Herron v Biggies Wolf Den, Inc,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Lisee v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Tri-Cities Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re Norris EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Neal v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Michigan AFSCME Council 25 v. Woodhaven-Brownstown School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Golden v. BaghdoianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.