Legal Opinion
Pero v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
Respondents, in this admiralty suit, served libelant’s proctor with a notice of their intention to take the oral deposition de bene esse, of one J. Boer, in Los An-geles, Cal. Thereupon, libelant moved to vacate and set aside the notice, or in the alternative, direct that respondents pay libel-ant the sum of $50 as counsel fees in order that he may be represented at the time of Boer’s examination.
Other than a general allegation that this action has been pending for more than two years, and that the trial, at the request of respondents, has repeatedly been adjourned, there…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. IversonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Kelly v. The TopsyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miranda v. City of GalvestonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
- In re Complaint of China Merchants Steam Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Weel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Molinos v. The Rio GrandeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
- Standard Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.