Legal Opinion

Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action to recover certain over-payments, alleged to have been made by the plaintiff to the defendant through mistake of the plaintiff and the fraud of the defendant. The answer was a general denial. The parties went to trial before a jury, and the defendant had a verdict and judgment, from which the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

I. The first error assigned is the exclusion of the shipping-book of the plaintiff which the plaintiff offered *568in evidence. In order to understand this assignment of error, it should be stated that the evidence was to the effect that the defendant was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coudy v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Anderson v. VolmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Berry v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Steinkamper v. McManusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Clarke v. KitchenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HeinzeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Berger v. St. Louis Storage & Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Steinwender v. CreathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Milligan v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Cramer v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API