Legal Opinion

Beth Bowen v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 2024No. 23-55116PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BETH BOWEN, Individually and on No. 23-55116 Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-04356- Plaintiff-Appellant, MWF-AGR v. OPINION ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.; EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE COMPANY; EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS, LLC; PLAYTEX PRODUCTS, INC.; SUN PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 13, 2024 Pasadena, California Filed October 1, 2024 2…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Andrew Cheung et al v. Slickdeals, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  2. Anna Mishina Shteerman v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Borrego Community Health Foundation v. HebetsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. Briggs v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Cameron Gazaway, et al. v. Jared Isaacman, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API