Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of N.G. v. Indiana Department of Child Services

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2015No. 02A04-1412-JT-605Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

. MATHIAS, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

[64] I concur in the majority’s decision affirming termination of Mother’s parental rights to N.G., but I respectfully dissent from my colleagues’ conclusion that the trial court’s judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights to L.C., and M,C. is not supported by sufficient evidence. Although termination of Mother’s parental rights to L.C. and M.C. might be a close call, given the well-established deference our court is required to give to trial courts in these matters, I would affirm the trial court in all respects.

[65] We have long…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of A.B. v. Marion County Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. W.B. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In re the Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re AIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Morrall v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API