In re Rowe
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
In view of the fact that the petitioner was found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, as a result of which he is still receiving court-ordered psychiatric care, and the additional fact that the affidavit of his own psychiatrist is not sufficient to raise an issue of fact in support of his mental fitness to practice law, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in denying the application without a hearing.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr.,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- In re RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993