Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. v. Giacoppa

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 23, 1943Published

1Dissent

I am unable to concur in the foregoing opinion because, as I view the matter, the employer, upon the facts stated in the certified question answered in that opinion was not in default in the payment of unemployment compensation at the time when it filed with the director of labor its petition for a review of the preliminary agreement.

It should be noticed that no compensation, under art. II, § 12 of the workmen's compensation act, for any specific injury to the employee is involved in this cause, but only general unemployment compensation.

It should also be kept in mind in answering this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Weber v. American Silk Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
  4. Ulmer v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Harvey v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API