Legal Opinion

Newton v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

The plaintiff brings this suit at law claiming $30,000 damages for various alleged wrongful acts of the defendants, stockbrokers, which caused losses to her as their customer. The only claim which the trial court allowed was based on a transaction of December 13,1928. At that time the defendants sold 200 shares of Houston Oil concededly without authority. This conversion was a technical conversion and not in any way made in bad faith. The customers’ man who sold the stock at about ninety-two and one-quarter thought he was doing it for the benefit of the account. The trial court has found that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Phillips v. Bank of Athens Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Greenberg v. New York City Planning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Miller Manufacturing Co. v. ZeilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API