Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
782 OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEIXAG AUSTIN !ifonorabls John D. Resd, Caamieslonoa~ Bureau of Labor Stctlstioa Auatfn, Tern6 Dear Sir: 0plnlon 90. o-SB70 Ra: (1) Is.lt moemary for aa em- ployer to recognlza a wag* aa- slgcasnt Of'OilSof his enlployesr without firat balng advlso& by the perllon h0laiq !he wage (LE- slgttmtnt? This is $a ndvlsa that wa knva given oar&l oon- elderatilonto the questions ststatl’above,pursuant to your opinion request of rsoent data. man Texas mrlsprudenoe wo quote the rollowing pertinent statement of tha lawt “1 Wawe. - Uagos are pro~orty, subject t3 sold…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mason v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- McKneely v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 1919