Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-3978Published

1Opinion of the Court

782 OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEIXAG AUSTIN !ifonorabls John D. Resd, Caamieslonoa~ Bureau of Labor Stctlstioa Auatfn, Tern6 Dear Sir: 0plnlon 90. o-SB70 Ra: (1) Is.lt moemary for aa em- ployer to recognlza a wag* aa- slgcasnt Of'OilSof his enlployesr without firat balng advlso& by the perllon h0laiq !he wage (LE- slgttmtnt? This is $a ndvlsa that wa knva given oar&l oon- elderatilonto the questions ststatl’above,pursuant to your opinion request of rsoent data. man Texas mrlsprudenoe wo quote the rollowing pertinent statement of tha lawt “1 Wawe. - Uagos are pro~orty, subject t3 sold…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. McKneely v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API