Legal Opinion
Wiersycki v. Pratt & Letchworth Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLytle, J.
Defendant moves for an order dismissing both causes of action alleged in the complaint on the ground that both of said causes of action are barred and outlawed by the Statute of Limitations.
From the complaint it appears that for a period of sixteen years and until on or about the 27th day of March, 1926, the decedent had been employed by the defendant as a moulder, steel chipper and shake-out man in connection with said work in the factory and foundry maintained and operated by the defendant in the city of Buffalo, N. Y. It is alleged that throughout said period of employment of the decedent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kelliher v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Madison v. Wedron Silica Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Taylor v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Street v. Consumers Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Scott v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- Michalek v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935