Legal Opinion

Earle v. Earle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Separate Maintenance.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G.Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in tins court at the October term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

This bill is for separate maintenance; and by decree entered February 27, 1895, the appellant was ordered to pay to the appellee, as alimony pendente lite, the sum of two hundred dollars a month, counting from the first day of January, 1895, six hundred dollars of which, for the months of January, February and March, was directed to be paid on or before March 1, A. D. 1895, and from thenceforward two hundred dollars a month was directed to be paid on the first day of each and every month thereafter; and to pay to the appellee or her solicitors the further sum of five hundred dollars as suit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Foote v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Jones v. JonesNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  4. Werner Co. v. First National Bank of MiamisburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  5. Wheeler v. WheelerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. LoweAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. StoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. General Gas Co. v. StuartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  4. Penney v. PenneySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Stuart v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API