Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1973No. 7326DC542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOEEIS, Judge.

Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of defendant’s failure to comply with Eule 19(d). We are of the opinion that under the circumstances and the procedure followed in this matter, the defendant was not aware that he was narrating evidence but was narrating, in the only form possible, the actual proceedings at the hearing. The motion is, therefore, denied.

At the proceeding of 16 February 1973, the court ordered stricken from the record certain letters and statements not sworn, to and left in the record certain letters and statements not sworn to. He examined…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Herron v. JersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API