Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Greenville — Judge Revill.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1.. If one of the jurors who convicted the accused was the first cousin of the prosecutor, this would be a valid ground for a new trial, provided the fact of relationship was unknown to the accused and his counsel at the time of the trial (Brown v. State, 28 Ga. 439; Bullard v. Trice, 63 Ga. 165), and provided, further, that this ground of the motion be shown to be true, either by accompanying affidavits or by recitals in the motion, verified by the trial judge. In this ease the fact of the relationship is not shown, and the trial judge expressly refuses to verify the recital of the fact of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Josey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Futch v. Quinn-Marshall Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914