Legal Opinion

Baker v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 28, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2022-2765Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NAMIG BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 22-2765 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This action, brought by sixty-one plaintiffs, arises out of sixteen separate terrorist attacks targeting U.S. military personnel that were carried out in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2012. See Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1; Pls.’ Mot. for Default J. (“Pls.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 31, Ex. 1, Pls.’ Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law (“Pls.’ Mem.”) at 1, 16, ECF No. 31-1. Each of these attacks…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API