Legal Opinion

State v. Reid

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J.,

concurring and dissenting.

I concur with the majority’s opinion affirming the conviction of the defendant. With regard to the imposition of the death sentences in this case, however, I cannot agree. My concerns, as expressed below, pertain to my continued dismay with the comparative proportionality review protocol imposed by the majority.

In accordance with my previous dissents, I maintain that the comparative proportionality review process applied by this Court fails because it does not protect defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. AshbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API