Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided April 18, 1990No. 88-1147-CIV-T-15CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CASTAGNA, District Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiff the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) motions for summary judgment on defendant Cherry, Bekaert & Holland’s (Cherry Bekaert) third, fourth and eleventh affirmative defenses, and the respective responses.
In February, 1986 the FDIC was appointed receiver of Park Bank. As receiver, the FDIC subsequently sold particular assets to the FDIC in its corporate capacity, the plaintiff in this case. The FDIC seeks damages from defendant Cherry Bekaert, a partnership of certified public accountants, for its alleged negligent audit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Former Officers And Directors Of Metropolitan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. New Hampshire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. NibloDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Shrader & York, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.