Legal Opinion

Pullen v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accusation of gaming. Before Judge Robinson. City court of Wrightsville. August .18, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

The plaintiff in error was brought to trial in the city court of Wrightsville, upon an accusation in which he, James H. Wright, and Jim Wright were jointly charged with the offense of “ gambling.” The trial resulted in the conviction of Pullen, who brought the case here for review by a bill of exceptions in which complaint is made, (1) that the court below overruled a demurrer to the accusation, and (2) that his motion for a new trial was also overruled. The first of these assignments of error was not insisted upon before this court. As to the second, we have reached the conclusion that a new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Pope & FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. McGregor v. Third National Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API