Legal Opinion
Richards v. Kaskel
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Plaintiffs are tenants of apartments in 360 East 72nd Street, New York, New York. They bring this action for a declaratory judgment that a plan under which the building has become a co-operative was in violation of the Bent Stabilization Law of 1969 and therefore null and void, and for incidental relief.
The action is against the sponsor of the plan (estate of Alfred L. Kaskel), the co-operative corporation (360 E. 72nd Street Owners Incorporated), the Administrator of the New York City Housing and Development Administration, and the Beal Estate Industry Stabilization Association of New York…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Picone v. Comr. of LicensesNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Schumer v. CaplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People ex rel. McGoldrick v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richards v. KaskelNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Smit v. Lexington Madison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011