Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Knoepfler

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 30, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

Inquiry was initiated by the court, pursuant to the provisions of section 144 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, into the facts and circumstances surrounding the execution of a holographic testamentary instrument dated August 26, 1957, purportedly signed by the testator and witnessed by three persons, which has been offered for probate. No objections were interposed to its admission to probate.

*66The instrument consists of three unattached sheets of paper of the same kind, written front and back of each sheet, each side numbered page No. 1, page No. la, page No. 2, page No. 2a, page…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baskin v. . BaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Hoysradt v. . KingmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of DoddsNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RimermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API