Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marbridge Building Co. v. White

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1921Published

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, in favor of plaintiff, after trial by the court without a jury.

1DissentMullan, J.

The plaintiff, owner of a business building, leased a room in it to defendant, for a term expiring May 1, 1920. The defendant having failed "to vacate upon the expiration of that term, the plaintiff caused his removal by means of summary proceedings, and thereafter brought this action for damages for the wrongful withholding of possession, and has recovered a sum representing the value of the use of the premises during the over-stay twelve days — and the counsel fees and disbursements necessarily paid in and for the summary proceeding. I am of the opinion that the judgment cannot be sustained.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Merchants' Realty & Improvement Co. v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Livingston v. RobbAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API