Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Petition to Annex Certain Territory

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 1972No. 56126Published

1DissentJustice Burman

I am unable to agree with the majority because (1) the petitioners, in my opinion, have not shown full compliance with the notice provisions of the annexation statute, (2) the description of the property contained in the Petition is insufficient to locate the property with certitude, (3) the testimony at the hearing of the maker of the affidavit attached to the Petition rebutted its prima facie validity, and (4) the entire property is not contiguous to the Village of South Barrington (hereafter referred to as South Barrington) within the meaning of the statute.

The Petition for annexation,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. Village of StreamwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Crocher v. AbelIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Weber v. AdlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McKeown v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People Ex Rel. Hopf v. Village of BensenvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API