Legal Opinion

State v. Midkiff

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1973No. 5327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

This appeal arises out of an action by the State of Hawaii, under its power of eminent domain to acquire certain parcels of land at Waiau, Oahu, fee simple title to which was held by Midkiff et al. as Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop (hereinafter “Bishop Estate”). This condemnation is a partial taking of the Bishop Estate’s holdings in the Ahupuaa of Waiau. The land taken consists of48.966 acres in the configuration of a large “X” which is now the Waiau Interchange of the H-l Interstate Freeway. Because of this unusual configuration of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. The Meadow Brook ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Max Wolff v. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  5. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stahl v. BalsaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City and County of Honolulu v. Market Place, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State, by Atty. Gen. v. Pioneer Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vieau v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API