Legal Opinion
Stutson v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 8, 1996No. 94-8988PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Per curiam
Our per curiam opinion issued today in a civil case, Lawrence v. Chafer, ante, p. 163; contains a general discussion of the considerations that properly influence this Court in deciding whether to grant a petition for certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand the case (GVR) for further consideration in light of potentially pertinent matters which it appears that the lower court may not have considered. Here, we apply that analysis to a criminal case, again finding that the particularities of the case before us merit a GVR.
Stutson, the petitioner in this case, is currently serving a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schacht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Temujin Kensu v. Allen C. Haigh Tom Bell Yvonne Murzen Sandy Grant Linda HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Gale PRIZEVOITS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Pratt v. PhilbrookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.