Munster v. O'Flarity
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Chief Judge.
Defendants move dismissal of plaintiffs’ appeal on quantum from a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor. Defendants argue that La.C.C.P. 2085 disallows plaintiffs’ appeal because by a party “who voluntarily and unconditionally acquiesced in a judgment rendered against him_”
Plaintiffs’ lawyer accepted payment for his clients, and gave a receipt acknowledging “satisfaction of the judgment ..., and ... certifypng] that the court’s docket should be and it hereby is marked ‘satisfied.’ ” A few days thereafter, as their lawyer’s letter calculating the amount of that payment had stated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jack v. Lambert's in Metairie, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Jeffers v. HansenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Jackson v. Ed's Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griffin v. Louisiana Sheriff's Auto RiskLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Johnson v. Hamilton Medical GroupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tolliver v. CrawfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Darby v. Quality Concrete Commercial Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- James Ronald Johnson v. Hamilton Medical GroupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.