Legal Opinion
Hatley v. Mullan
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 18, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00820Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 LARENA HATLEY, CASE NO. C21-0820-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 JOYCE L. MULLAN, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 16 65). Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its order granting Defendant leave to amend its 17 Answer. (Id.; see Dkt. Nos. 57, 61.) Plaintiff contends the Court misinterpreted the import of its 18 prior order striking the “remaining case schedule” in this matter. (Dkt. No. 65 at 3…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Accent Films, B v. V. Universal City Studios, Inc., and McA Incorporated, Accent Films, B v. Ghaith International S.A. Saudi Research & Development Corporation, Ltd. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. McA IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994