Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Cunha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT, HONOLULU.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This is an appeal on points of law from a judgment of the District Magistrate of Honolulu finding the defendant guilty of violating Section 2 of Act 4 of the Laws of 1901 and sentencing him to pay a fine of $25 and costs. Two points are raised: (1) that the law is unconstitutional, (2) that the evidence was insufficient.

*608Tbe law, omitting tbe enacting clause and Section 4, which provides when it shall take effect, reads as follows:

“An Act to Prevent tbe Employment of Minors in Places-Where Intoxicating Liquors are Sold, and to Prevent Minors from Visiting such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. People v. . EwerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. TamHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. HallHawaii Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API