Miller v. Monona County
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.
For convenience, the Haitz district will be referred to as if it were the only defendant, the others not having appealed.
Following an unsuccessful attempt to establish a drainage district in the same territory, Haitz district was completed in 1915. The proceedings by which this was accomplished were not challenged then and are not now. To aid in an understanding of the general plan of the project, we attach a plat of the district. It will be observed that the main ditch runs in a generally north and south direction. The engineer’s plan provided for the construction of laterals extending…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Frances v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 19Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Reed v. Muscatine—Louisa Drainage District 13Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Coe v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Droegmiller v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Gannon v. RumbaughCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.