Legal Opinion

Prater v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1908No. 3892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Liberty County. Motion to retax cost in the Court of Criminal Appeals, incurred in a misdemeanor case and entered against the sureties on appellant’s recognizance. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BAMSET, Judge.

This was a motion to retax cost. In addition to the sum of $10 allowed the clerk, there was taxed the sum of $10, fee allowed the attorney-general in misdemeanor cases, as well as costs for issuing writ of execution and return thereon.

The motion questions the legality of these items and the authority of this court to adjudge these sums against the sureties on appellant’s recognizance. In the case of Arbuthnot v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 509, it was held that these fees are legitimate items of costs taxable against appellant and his sureties, where the judgment has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arbuthnot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Weaver v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hogg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Conner v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tafolla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API