Thompson v. Manrow
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the superior court of the city of Sail Francisco, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bennett, J.
The action was brought upon a judgment of the court of common pleas of the city of New York.
Two points are made by the appellants ; one, that the certificate of exemplification is insufficient; the other, that there is no proof that the John P. Manrow sued here is the same John P. Manrow against whom judgment was rendered in New York. I think neither position tenable.
The exemplification of the record is attested by the clerk under the seal of the court, and the presiding judge of the court certifies that the attestation is in due form of law. This is all that is…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Haynes v. CowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Williams v. BinkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bryan v. KalesArizona Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.