Legal Opinion

Tremp v. Board of Public Safety

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 20, 1944No. File No. 7950Published

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

The office of a demurrer serves the purpose of admitting facts well pleaded. Hardy vs. Scott, 111 Conn. 722, 723; State’s Attorney vs. Selectmen of Branford, 59 id. 402, 411. For the purposes of the interposed demurrer the following facts in abbreviated form are admitted: (1) On November 9, 1934, in accordance with law, a detective bureau was established within the Police Department of the City of Torrington and plaintiff, then a police sergeant, was assigned to duty therein; (2) on August 28, 1939, defendant board under the authority conferred upon it by law passed a vote promoting plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Deming v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Comstock v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Doolittle v. Selectmen of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API