Tremp v. Board of Public Safety
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
The office of a demurrer serves the purpose of admitting facts well pleaded. Hardy vs. Scott, 111 Conn. 722, 723; State’s Attorney vs. Selectmen of Branford, 59 id. 402, 411. For the purposes of the interposed demurrer the following facts in abbreviated form are admitted: (1) On November 9, 1934, in accordance with law, a detective bureau was established within the Police Department of the City of Torrington and plaintiff, then a police sergeant, was assigned to duty therein; (2) on August 28, 1939, defendant board under the authority conferred upon it by law passed a vote promoting plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Deming v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Comstock v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Doolittle v. Selectmen of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.