RINGCENTRAL, INC. v. Quimby
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND SET ASIDE DEFAULT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff RingCentral, Inc. obtained a default judgment of $432,888.29 against TollFreeNumbers.Com, Inc. and its principal, Bill Quimby, representing $200,000 in statutory penalties for each of two Lanham Act violations, plus attorney fees and costs. Defendants now move to vacate the default judgment and to set aside the underlying entry of default. In light of defendants’ showing that their failure to respond to the complaint did not reflect a bad faith attempt to manipulate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of MesleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Elizabeth Albright Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., a Corporation Robert J. Vile, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Walker & Zanger (West Coast) Ltd. v. Stone Design S.A.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- BioQ Pharma Incorporated v. GS HoldingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. S Cue Transportation LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Steven L. Lombardo v. Mercantile Resource Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021