D’antignac v. Deere & Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
This appeal arises from Veronica D’Antignac’s suit against her employer, Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere Commercial Products, Inc. (“John Deere”), for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent retention. The superior court granted summary judgment to John Deere, finding that, inter alia, D’Antignac’s claims were barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel because of her failure to disclose these claims in a prior Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. We agree and affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bullard v. Blue Hills BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Robinson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulton County v. Ward-PoagSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Ward-Poag v. Fulton County.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Julie Ann Greenlee v. Molly Jo TidebackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- WILLIAM HAYES v. KSP SERVICES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024