Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Finnegan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Dubugue District Court. — Hon. M. 0. Matthews, Judge. Action to recover for price of certain stock. The defendant appeals from a judgment entered against him.—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, 0. J. —

1 The plaintiff, having acquired, through defendant, certain stock in the Minneapolis Building & Loan Association, exchanged it with him for 51 shares of stock in the- Lefflér Magnetic Electric Railroad Company of Chicago, 111. As a part of the transaction, the defendant executed this agreement: “Dubuque, la., Aug. 8, 1895. Six months after date, I promise to pay William Hamilton thirty-five ($35.00) dollars per share in cash for 51 shares of the Lefiler Magnetic Electric R. R. Company stock. Said Hamilton has the right to accept or reject this offer at the expiration of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Osgood v. Bauder & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Bagley v. FindlayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Cannon v. FolsomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gregg v. Middle States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Sempel v. Northern Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Lyons v. SniderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Moench v. HowerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Hawkeye Securities Fire Insurance v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API