Legal Opinion

LaViolette v. Sapp

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 30, 1973No. 42278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

278 So.2d 598 (1973)

David F. LaVIOLETTE et al., Petitioners,

v.

Arletha C. SAPP, Individually and As Natural Mother and Next Friend of Michael Joe Sapp, a Minor, Respondent.

No. 42278.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 30, 1973.

Richard M. Gale, of Sherouse & Virgin, Miami, and Fisher, Hepner & Hertz, Pensacola, for petitioners.

Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Pensacola, for respondent.

DEKLE, Justice.

This cause involves a conflict certiorari review of the decision rendered by the First District Court of Appeal and reported at 258 So.2d 507. We granted certiorari[1] without oral argument[2] in order to resolve a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry Farber and Sam Levy, Third-Party v. Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Boyd v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Adams v. PowersSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Sapp v. LaVioletteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FIDELITY & CAS. CO., NY v. FonsecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. South Carolina Ins. Co. v. HeuerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API