Legal Opinion
Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman PC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 2021No. 1:06-cv-01202Unknown
1Opinion
f | f af □□ fee a AMY R. GURVEY Nec dt US Patentee/Plaintiff PRO SE (> (Yn 315 Highland Avenue Chast C of Upper Montclair, NJ 07043 VW bth PH 917-733-9981 / ] amygurvey@gmail.com ( UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT me SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DENIED as untimely. Plaintiff seeks to vacate the = Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Lathman, entered on July 7, 2017, under Rule 60(b). Plaintiff's pe et al. is based largely on new evidence, the evidence of a tent. Rule 60(c)(1) provides that a motion under Rule 60(b) gy reasons of newly discovered evidence must be filed “no Case No. 06 Civ. 1202 (LGS)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Williams v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- The Bronx Household of Faith, Robert Hall and Jack Roberts v. Board of Education of the City of New York and Community School District No. 10Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.