Legal Opinion
United States v. Binday
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 2012No. 12 Cr 152(CM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ PRETRIAL MOTIONS
McMAHON, District Judge.
Defendants Michael Binday, James Kergil and Mark Resnick are each charged in the instant indictment with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One), mail fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341 (Count Two), and wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (Count Three). The indictment also charges Kergil and Resnick with conspiracy to destroy records and obstruct justice, in violation of Title 18,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Milstead v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Milstead v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. GattoDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.