Legal Opinion

Lacaretta Restaurant v. Zepeda

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 2013No. 1D13-0993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation case, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) petitions for writ of certiorari from a discovery order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims. Although the order is broad, the E/C challenges only the compelled disclosure of “Note A” and “Note B,” which are entries in the E/C’s internal paperless communication/documentation system, the first note made by the adjuster to memorialize a meeting with in-house counsel, and the second note made by in-house counsel herself. The E/C asserts that both notes are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work product…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lender Processing Services, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. RaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Lee v. Condell and EstacheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. J.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. ANCHOR PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. EDUARDO TESINIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API