Legal Opinion

In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litigation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 26, 2012No. Civil Action Nos. 10-2033 (FLW), 11-4993(FLW), 11-2511(FLW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge:

Presently before the Court is a motion to approve the final settlement reached between Plaintiffs-shareholders and nominal Defendant J & J Corporation (“J & J”) in several consolidated shareholder derivative actions, as well as motions to intervene and dismiss by an objector to the settlement. Through the settlement, J & J agrees to institute corporate governance changes and pay up to $10 million in attorney’s fees and $450,000 in costs, subject to this Court’s approval. For the following reasons, the Court will approve the settlement and appoint a special…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ALLIED WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY v. KENNEY & MCCAFFERTY, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Clem v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
  3. Fotouhi v. DiorioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  4. HOLDEN v. GUARDIAN ANALYTICS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. In re Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Stockholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API